Friday, 15 October 2010

The LOST books: Bitesize reviews of those that I have read so far

One of my favourite things about my favourite show of all time, LOST, is that the writers so often featured literature in the show (either shots of the books themselves or references to them), both as a way for the writers to recommend great works of literature to the audience and as an insight into which literary works held the most influence on the writers and the show's design.

I can't find a complete list of them all online, only different incomplete lists, some of which reveal books that other don't, so I'll just have to work with hwat I have. A bulky (but certainly not complete) list can be found at here, which I am taking most of my episode notes from to start with.

Being a hardcore fan, my aim is to read all of these Lost books (or all of the ones that sound interesting anyway), and I own a great any of them already.

I've already read quite a few of them (most of them before Lost even aired or before the books wee featured in the show), so instead of reading them again in order to provide a decent, lengthy review, I thought I would just provide bitesize reviews of each to save time, and then longer reviews of each new Lost book I read for the first time, when I get around to them.

Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck



Referenced in: ('Every Man for Himself' and 'The Substitute') This book appeared in prison with Sawyer as his book of choice. Sawyer and Ben later discussed the book on the island. Sawyer also claims it is his favourite book and recounts the novel's ending to the Man in Black in The Substitute.

By far my favourite of the books I studied at secondary school. A touching and expertly crafted novel on the dreams of simple men and the dangers of innocence. And the ending, of course, as Sawyer highlights, is one of the best in literature.

The Turn of the Screw - Henry James



Referenced in: ('Orientation') The DHARMA Initiative Orientation film was hidden behind this book, on a bookcase, in The Swan station.

Perhaps the novel that poses the best ambiguity: is she insane and imagining the ghosts and the children being deceivers? Or is she sane and thus these paranormal events really happening to her? It's written to carefully and cleverly that you can never be sure either way. It isn't even known which Henry James thought it was, with the exception of some minor hints in some of his letters to his friends if I remember rightly. Is it a coincidence that this pops up in the show just as we are introduced to a character that has spent an entire three years alone in a hatch? Perhaps it is meant to nudge us to question Desmond's sanity upon that first meeting, and if not his mental stability, then certainly the sanity of pushing a button every 108 minutes to stop the world ending.

A Brief History of Time - Stephen Hawking



Referenced in: ('Not in Portland' and 'The Man from Tallahassee') When Alex, Kate, and Sawyer arrived to rescue Karl, Aldo was seen reading this book while standing guard. Ben has a copy of the book inside his living room in the Barracks.

A little tough to get through at times for someone like me who has a keen interest in such content but has very little knowledge on it. Clearly black holes, the fact that we can achieve time travel in some form for real, etc. are all closely tied to LOST's plot; with the island time jumps for example. Perhaps with this the writers are saying that some SF concepts that we thought were impossible are proving possible through the development of science, so some of the ideas used in the show (an island with unique and strange physics properties for example) might not be so improbable.

Lord of the Flies - William Golding



Referenced in: ('...In Translation' and ' What Kate Did') After the raft is burned, Sawyer makes a reference to Jin about Lord of the Flies, in that the survivors might have been civilized before the crash, but have now turned to savages. When the Tail Sections survivors re-unite with the Fuselage survivors, Charlie comments that it seems like they went "Lord of the Flies".

The parallels with the show here are blindingly obvious. A group of kids land on an island and two sides emerge, one led by a savage child and one by a civilized child (Locke and Jack?). An entertaining read, but it just fell short of the mark for me for a true classic of literature. Without it though, we wouldn't have Sawyer's excellent quote "It's Lord of the flies time now".

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's stone - J. K. Rowling



Referenced in: ('Deus Ex Machina') Hurley makes a reference to Harry Potter when he comments that Sawyer with glasses resembles a "steam-rolled Harry Potter".

I was quite surprised that this was in here to be honest. As can be seen above, the link is flimsy, but still present none-the-less. As much as I may look down upon them now, I admit I did find them immensely addictive in my teen years. Several of the books featured in the show are children's books, and Harry Potter is undeniable a great example odd such. I don't think any parallels can be drawn to the show's design here, however, beyond Hurley's mocking of Sawyer.

The Epic of Gilgamesh



Referenced in: ('Collision') As Locke completes a crossword puzzle in the hatch, the clue for 42 Down is "Enkidu's friend", to which Locke fills in "Gilgamesh".

Famed as being the first work of fiction literature ever written I believe (certainly the first fantasy work), I studied this during my degree and found it quite an entertaining read. It's very short, so won't take up much of your time, and is well worth the effort.

To Kill A Mockingbird - Harper Lee



Referenced in: ('The Cost of Living') Juliet enters Jack's holding room and brings a TV with a hidden message about Ben, but before airing it she tricks the cameras into thinking she's showing Jack "To Kill a Mockingbird", a film starring Gregory Peck, based off Harper Lee's novel.

Who can fault Lee's brilliant novel that focuses on race issues and morality all through the eyes of a young girl. It took me a while to get through it, but it is no doubt a masterpiece. Certainly worth your time.

Slaughterhouse 5 - Kurt Vonnegut



Referenced in: Likened to Desmond's predicament of being unstuck in time - Billy, the novel's protagonist, goes through the same thing.

Not Vonnegut's best I feel (so far, for me, that goes to 'The Sirens of Titan'), but still an excellent SF novel. It successfully deals with a real life issue - the Dresden bombings - which is probably why it is so accepted (or stolen) by the literature field and at the same deal deals full on with the SF trope of time travel. A great work.

VALIS - Philip K. Dick




Referenced in: Locke gives this to Ben, Ben claims he has read it, but Locke tells him he may have missed something the first time round.

Admittedly, I haven't read this twice yet, as the writers suggest, so I may not have picked up on those 'things I might have missed the first time around', but I love Philip K. Dick and I love this work. Heavily focused on what Dick truly believed was a religious experience that happened to him and detailing his subsequent beliefs that followed that event (for example, that we are all still trapped in the time of the Roman Empire), it is a wonderful head trip through the mind of this genius late in his career. He crucially considers whether his experience could just have been a drug induced hallucination (he was on drugs for his tooth at the time), or indeed whether he was and is in fact insane, as well as considering that he truly was contacted by a divine being. I can't wait to give this a second read. One of his best books.

The Invention of Morel - Adolfo Bioy Casares



Referenced in: Read by Sawyer in the Barracks.

One of the first books I bought and read after seeing it featured in the show. The writers clearly drew quite heavily from this one; it concerns an island that a man becomes stranded upon where he finds a marvel of science - it is populated by hollograms that exist on a repeat loop (Morel's invention) that was made so that the people it portrays might have their souls transferred to it so they might live forever. An interesting read that is well worth picking up.

The Mentalist - 'The Red Carpet Treatment' (Season 3, Episode 4): Reconciliation and revenge


“Was it worth it? The man that killed your wife no longer exists. The time you took pursuing him, the pain the sacrifice, was it worth it?” - Jane

“Yes it was” - Max

Despite this episode being a little like someone has suddenly hit the brakes on this season's run of excellent main story arc-relevant episodes so far, it still has it's qualities and also minor links to Jane's past and his plight against Red John.

We have Jane's return to being on a talk show for the first time since the appearance that got his family killed - proving that, when he needs to in order to catch a killer, Jane can put others' needs before his own fears/compulsions.

Crucially, we also have the question in the above quote dealt with and explored; will revenge satiate Jane when he gets it? And is it worth it? Perhaps surprisingly, since so often many forms of fiction tell us the exact opposite, the answer given to that question here is 'yes'. Despite this show's showy comic facade, it has an underlying bleakness to it that I love. When it comes down to dark themes, it deals with them in a suitably dark manner. The character Max here shooting his wife's murderer many times in the head after he was dead just to get some form of revenge is another example of this.

Still a good episode, in a great run.

Fringe - 'Do Shapeshifters Dream of Electric Sheep?' (Season 3, Episode 4): A monster's love


“Sometimes monsters aren’t all that bad. Sometimes, if you get to spend some time with them they can be very surprising. They can be incredibly sweet and pure and capable of great great love. And then, one of them might actually become your best best friend” - Ray (a shapeshifter)

Charmingly constructing its title by borrowing from the title of the Philip K. Dick novel 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?', this excellent episode, like the novel, explores than unrelenting SF question of can an artificial life form (in the novel, replicants, and here, shape shifters) have emotions in the same manner that humans do?

Right from the episode's opening we are shown that these creatures are capable of love and kindness - the senator shapeshifter is kind to two young girls who are selling lemonade, without any ulterior motive as far as we can see. And his kindness is ultimately his downfall, since as he smiles as the girls' shouts that he forgot his change whilst looking in his rear view mirror, he is hit by another car and hospitalised.

We are then presented with another shapeshifter, this one living under the guise of a family man, who has clearly grown and retains strong emotional ties with 'his' child and wife. I found this man's story and the way he alters his mission (he doesn't shape-shift during it in the hopes that he can return to his family life afterwards) quite moving. And his ties are also his downfall; with Newton taking care of this potentially compromisable part of his organisation.

Through the theme of can an artificial being becoming too emotionally attached when undercover, we of course explore at the same time whether alt-Olivia has or is succumbing in the same manner. Newton - before his death, which I feel is a great loss for the show - confronts her on this and accuses her outright of warming to the enemy, stating that ultimately it would be here downfall; and based on the demise of the shapeshifters featured in this episode (both due to them loving humans), it seems that alt-Olivia is likely destined for the same fate. It makes me wonder if she will do something drastic now to try to disprove Newton's accusation (to herself); we know she is capable of killing innocence in cold blood, so I'm fearful about what she might do to any given member of our main cast when put in a corner.



I don't know how to read into alt-Olivia mounting Peter at the end; it could be her embracing her emotional ties to him, thinking 'stuff the consequences', but it is probably more likely her trying to disprove Newton (to herself again) by performing an act of deep emotion while retaining an aloofness to it in her mind - essentially a test for herself; can she remain emotionally disciplined even when sleeping with him.

Thursday, 14 October 2010

Tom Hardy given a lead role in Batman 3


After his appearance in Nolan’s Inception, the news has hit that Tom Hardy will be playing one of the lead roles in Nolan’s immensely anticipated third Batman film.

Lips are sealed regarding whether he'll be playing a villain, but that is probably a safe assumption to make (not only because the source for this news insinuates such). Just which villain, however, is anyone’s guess.

The Riddler seems to be the highest on the list of fans’ speculations regarding which villain Nolan will hinge the third film upon. Could we be looking at our prime antagonist right here? Although it is not surprising that Nolan chose Hardy after he gave such a good turn in Inception, many thought Joseph Gordon-Levitt (another great Inception star) the far more likely choice (and perhaps he may appear on the cast list yet).

Hardy is set to play Mad Max in the reboot Mad Max: Fury Road, but luckily for bat-fans this has hit another delay and won't resurface for a while. Hardy has recently been shooting Thomas Alfredson’s Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy and is scheduled to soon start filming McG’s This Means War, alongside Reese Witherspoon. Presumably after completing these two films he would be free to start shooting Batman 3. And when Mad Max does eventually come back to light, we are assured he will still be playing the role.

The first lead role having been cast for Batman 3, bat-fans can feel satiated by the fact that this project is now truly underway.

Do fans feel that Hardy would make a good Batman villain? If he is to play a villain, just which one do you think it might be?

(This news feature was written by me for the site www.thefilmpilgrim.com, on which it can also be found)